Calibrating…

Product Manager · Builder · Hyderabad, India

Product Manager

The PM who talks to users Monday, writes the spec Tuesday, argues with engineering Wednesday, ships Thursday, reads the data Friday.

6+ yrs 6 industries 70% F100 Live SaaS MVP Security · Marketplace · Retention · Health · EdTech

Email directly
Or jump straight here — who are you?

Build your rubric. I'll match the evidence to it.

Senior PMs scan for signal against what they need — not every bullet. This mirrors that process. The site is the product demo.

01Who is evaluating?
02What must be true to hire me?
03How much depth do you need?
Evidence match to rubric—
"Titles are cheap. The right call when data is thin and the org disagrees — that's the actual job."

Six years across domains that punish shallow PM work: enterprise DevSecOps, global marketplace funnels, retention analytics, regulated healthcare, ed-tech 0→1 — plus a live SaaS I built and shipped myself. Not breadth for the CV. Pattern transfer under constraint, compounded.

0Years shipping product
0Industries — patterns transfer
0F100 context · current role
0Live SaaS · shipped solo

Decisions with receipts.
Click any card to open.

Integrity note — I don't inflate roles, round up metrics I didn't own, or list tools to look technical. Direct references available on request.

Two calls I'd defend in your debrief

Pick a move first — then see the reasoning ladder.

Context — E-commerce marketplace. Listing completion is 40% below target. GMV is bleeding. Leadership wants a roadmap fix in Q2. Engineering has 6 weeks of capacity. What is your first move?

What I actually did — and why it was the only defensible call

Mapped the full seller journey before touching a single pixel. Found 3 exact drop-off points via funnel analysis. Ran targeted UX experiments at those leaks — not a six-week rewrite, not a support band-aid. Built dashboards the ops team used daily for months after.

ObserveFunnel geometry before opinion. 3 leaks beat 40 assumptions.
BetLearning speed under deadline beats looking decisive.
NoFull redesign: too slow to learn. Live support: treats symptoms, not root cause.
SignalDiscovery → sequencing → experiment design → operational metrics. Without saying those words in a single meeting.

Context — DevSecOps platform, Fortune 100 customers. Enterprise clients request 20+ new package ecosystem integrations. Your research lead wants 5 marquee integrations instead — better for ARR. One team. One quarter. What do you recommend?

What I shipped — and the regulatory timing behind it

Breadth across formats plus SBOM compliance ahead of regulation, with enterprise betas before GA. Security engineers instrument daily in CI/CD — not in integration showcase slides. Daily workflow coverage compounds. Marquee demos don't.

ObserveSecurity engineers triage in pipelines — formats cover daily toil, marquee integrations cover sales QBRs.
BetSBOM before the law = market lead. Regulatory tailwind is rare — use it.
No5 marquee integrations that demo well but don't reduce the 1,000-alerts-per-day problem.

When I'm not your hire

The best PMs disqualify fast. This saves us both from a painful 90-day mistake.

Not a ticket PM

Backlog grooming with no customer contact and no outcome ownership? We'll both be frustrated within the first sprint.

Not a slide-deck PM

If success is measured in decks delivered — not experiments shipped and metrics moved — I'm the wrong hire.

Not a lone wolf

I push back on engineering and design before committing. If your culture punishes that tension, I won't thrive.

The portfolio is itself the product demo

Segmentation on entry

Path + rubric changes what highlights and dims — not just copy, but evidence weight.

Progressive disclosure

Skim / standard / forensic — one asset, three distinct jobs-to-be-done for different evaluators.

Recommender UI

Rubric chips drive a lightweight matching engine — same pattern as B2B product filtering.

Evaluator tooling

Pin → copy brief. Built for your ATS workflow and hiring debrief, not my vanity.

I don't wait for the title "builder PM"

Open source · Live · Public · 2026

TokenLens

Engineering teams spending $500–5,000/month on AI coding tools have no idea if they're spending it wisely. Existing tools show cost charts. None tell you why a session cost 4× more than average, or that one config change halves the next bill. No one had built the intelligence layer on top of the data.

I built it. TokenLens assigns every project an A–F Efficiency Score, auto-generates recommendations with dollar savings estimates, detects anomalous sessions, and calculates a developer ROI multiplier — all from local logs, zero cloud dependencies, zero external packages. Full backend, REST API, SPA dashboard, and a built-in pitch deck. Shipped solo.

Market gap → product differentiation → full-stack build → open source release. Same loop I'd run with your founding team.

TokenLens dashboard — live AI spend intelligence

LIVE DASHBOARD · Click to view on GitHub ↗

If I join your team — first 10 days